![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Chomsky on The Bank of the South
There's a very concise interview with Chomsky @ alternet.org about the new South American Bank, headed up by the new left, and of course, about the failures of the IMF and World Bank. It's often hard to ask Chomsky questions that he then gives sizeable explanations (that just anyone can grasp) to in response.
Chomsky on the fall of the IMF:
The IMF is in trouble now because it is losing its reserves. It was functioning on debt collection and if countries either restructured their debt or refused to pay it, they're in trouble. Incidentally the countries could legitimately refuse to pay much of the debt, because, in my opinion at least, it was illegal in the first place. For example, if I lend you money, and I know you're a bad risk, so I get high interest payments, and then you tell me at one point, sorry I can't pay anymore, I can't call on my neighbors to force you to pay me. Or I can't call on your neighbors to pay it off. But that's the way the IMF works. You lend money to a dictatorship and an elite, the population has nothing to do with it, you get very high interest because it's obviously risky, they say they can't pay it off, you say okay your neighbors will pay for it. It's called structural adjustment. And my neighbors will pay me off. That's the IMF as a creditors' cartel. You get higher taxes from the north.
And then when asked about what other initiatives are springing up alongside the new leftist Southern Bank:
It's already happening. Kuwait has already made a limited move toward a basket of currencies. The United Arab Emirates and Dubai are moving toward their own partial development funds. Saudi Arabia, that's the big important one, if they join in it'll become a major independent center of funding, lending, purchasing, and so on. It's already happening. Investment in the rich countries and to some extent in the region, particularly North Africa. Separate development funds. It's a limited move; they don't want to anger the United States.
Add to this the calls for altering the currency of oil trade by Venezuala and Iran. If they get there way, we might see the petro dollar which the US relies upon so dearly, in return investment and the like, significantly detach itself from US hegemony. What's next? The Saudi's pulling their large investment out of the US economy?
Trackback URL for this post:
- Thomas Czermak's blog
- Login or register to post comments











Banco del Sur
I was recently at a conference about the changing nature of development finance, and there were two panelists who spoke about the Bank of the South. One was an Argentinian professor who took a positive look at it as an alternative to the IFI's which have dominated development finance discourse around the world. The second was a Brazilian activist (Fabrina Furtado) who warned that while the Bank of the South has been couched in leftist talk and aspirations, she has seen nothing from it which would suggest that it wouldn't replicate the hierarchical functions and pro-growth orientation of the global IFI's. She led us through a presentation about the sort of continental integration plans being pushed by Brazil which would build environmentally destabilizing trade and resource extraction corridors through important ecosystems in Brazil, increase resource extraction from indigenous land without community involvement, etc.... Part of her activism work has been to lobby the Brazilian government to accept civil society input into the formation of the Banco del Sur, but they have been completely non-responsive. She said that Chavez and Morales have questioned certain aspects of the Bank's orientation, but not it's overall drive.
I hope I'm getting presentation correct. The powerpoint she used is available online at http://www.halifaxinitiative.org/updir/FabrinaFurtado.ppt if anyone is interested.
Neil